If you send the warranty to your insurer (through your broker) to consent, it can respond under the name “Note, subject to insurance conditions.” This simply means that they are aware of the guarantee, but it is still subject to the current conditions of the directive We have previously discussed the adequacy clauses, but we can now go into detail. Your policy may prevent you from accepting an obligation by subscribing to a guarantee that says what you have provided will be useful – whether you guarantee that it will work permanently or that it will meet a certain standard/specification, which may happen. Sold in packages of 3rd type standard contract for use, if the employer of the promoter has a security guarantee by an advisor for the entire … If you sign the Collateral Warranty Agreement, you will establish a legal relationship with a third party and create a new contractual relationship that would not otherwise have existed. This means that once the project is completed, you will accept an additional duty of care to that third party. You may then find that, although you have fulfilled the terms of your agreement with your direct customer, the third party comes directly against you because it does not meet the conditions of the warranty guarantee. If you are obliged to sign the collateral guarantee because you agreed to it under the terms of your original agreement, or because you are pushed to do so and decide to respect it, there are two main points to consider: once again, this is a subject we raised earlier. Your policy almost certainly prevents you from providing such a guarantee or from accepting such sanctions. Make sure that such clauses are removed from the contract or guarantee before you sign them, otherwise your policy does not cover these additional obligations. Sold in the packaging of the 3rd standard agreement to be used when an advisor must provide an ancillary guarantee to a buyer or tenant of all or part of an industrial or industrial development. ISBN 978-1-898671… A typical example would be the fact that an architect of a new office development owes a duty of care to a construction occupant, as these are subsequent defects.